These people were completely obsessed with monsters. Not your sanitised Disney fare, but proper, sophisticated, intellectually rigorous freaks. We're talking about a civilisation that took one look at reality and said, "You know what this needs? More dragons playing harps, dudes who turn into wolves after a few drinks, and a seven-foot green knight who can survive decapitation like it's a particularly aggressive haircut."
I want to examine the interconnected traditions of monstrous transformation in medieval European culture, focusing on the period from the 8th to the 15th centuries. The medieval world was haunted by creatures that defied categorical boundaries, beings that existed in the spaces between human and animal, sacred and profane, civilised and wild. These monster-musicians, shapeshifters, and enigmatic challengers like the Green Knight weren't just decorative flourishes or entertainment. They were profound expressions of medieval anxieties about identity, transformation, and the permeable boundaries of the self. They inhabited what Michel de Certeau identifies as "the borderland as the space of the other," serving as repositories for everything that medieval Christian civilisation sought to define itself against, whilst simultaneously acknowledging the persistent power of pre-Christian traditions and the fundamental instability of all categorical distinctions.
The emergence of the Ars Subtilior musical manuscripts (c. 1370-1420) parallels the literary developments of monstrous transformation, with works like the Chantilly Codex and Modena Codex preserving musical traditions that blur boundaries between sacred and secular, human and non-human performance. This "more subtle art", so named by musicologist Ursula Günther in 1963 to distinguish it from the earlier Ars Nova, represents one of the most radical experiments in Western musical history, pushing notation, rhythm, and compositional complexity to extremes that would not be matched until the twentieth century.
Yet this name itself reflects a fundamental misunderstanding that recent scholarship has worked to correct. The term arose from Philippe de Vitry's characterization of the new rhythmic notation as "subtilior" (more subtle), but as Willi Apel warned, this should not suggest the music itself was necessarily more refined or delicate. Indeed, the repertory encompasses what Nors Josephson identifies as "numerous concurrent musical styles" with radically different compositional approaches, from pervasively diatonic works firmly rooted in Machaut's tradition to chromatic experiments that wouldn't be equaled for centuries.
The Ars Subtilior emerged during one of the most turbulent periods of medieval European history: the Great Schism (1378-1417) when rival popes in Rome and Avignon competed for legitimacy, the continuing devastations of the Hundred Years' War, and the recurring outbreaks of plague following the Black Death's initial catastrophe (1347-1352). This was a world in profound crisis, where established authorities were contested, certainties crumbled, and the boundaries between legitimate and illegitimate, human and inhuman, sacred and profane became increasingly permeable.
The Chantilly Codex, compiled around 1380-1400 in southern France or northern Italy, stands as the most comprehensive repository of Ars Subtilior repertoire. Its 112 folios contain over 100 compositions, predominantly secular chansons but also motets and mass movements that defy simple categorization.
What makes the Chantilly Codex extraordinary is not merely the complexity of its musical notation but the visual presentation of that notation. Pieces like Baude Cordier's "Belle, Bonne, Sage" are notated in the shape of a heart, while his "Tout par compas suy composés" forms a perfect circle with text inscribed in various circles resembling "Medieval clocks on city towers." These aren't mere decorative flourishes, they're visual manifestations of the music's meaning, transforming the manuscript page into a space where sound becomes visible, where temporal art becomes spatial object, where the boundaries between different sensory modes collapse entirely.
Yet scholarly consensus about the Chantilly manuscript's origins has shifted dramatically. Once assumed to represent diverse "southern" composers, Yolanda Plumley's archival research demonstrates strong connections between these works and the patronage of French princes Louis d'Anjou and Jean de Berry. Both princes spent significant time in Paris governing France but also maintained extended periods in Languedoc and Avignon for political reasons. The manuscript likely represents music from "a relatively circumscribed set of composers" working in connected French princely and papal circles rather than diverse southern origins.
The manuscript preserves works by composers whose biographical details reveal unexpected mobility: Matheus de Sancto Johanne served Louis d'Anjou's household chapel before joining the papal chapel at Avignon (1382-1386). Jaquet de Noyon received payment on October 28, 1374 for entertaining the Duke of Anjou, 60 gold francs "to buy a harp and to travel to the minstrel schools", before later serving Johan of Aragon and Giangaleazzo Visconti. These composers didn't belong to a fixed "southern school" but circulated through an international network of aristocratic and ecclesiastical patronage.
Compiled slightly earlier than Chantilly (c. 1380-1410) and likely originating in northern Italy, the Modena Codex contains approximately 180 compositions spanning Italian and French repertoires. While less visually extravagant than Chantilly, Modena reveals the international circulation of this musical style and its adaptation across linguistic and cultural boundaries.
The Modena manuscript demonstrates particular interest in the Italian madrigal and caccia traditions, forms that themselves blur boundaries between voices in ways that parallel the transformations of medieval shapeshifting narratives. In the caccia (literally "hunt"), two voices pursue each other in canon while a slower-moving tenor provides foundation, a musical chase scene where identities merge, separate, and constantly reconfigure.
Crucially, the Modena manuscript preserves multiple versions of the same compositions, revealing the fluid relationship between notation and performance. Anne Stone's analysis of Antonio Zacara da Teramo's Credo, which survives in four manuscripts, demonstrates this: three contain "essentially the same cantus line" but Modena includes "a cantus line thoroughly ornamented with small diminutions, represented by a variety of note shapes including some that are typical of ars subtilior practice." This ornamented version, possibly attributable to Matteo da Perugia who served as magister capellae at Milan Cathedral, suggests the complex notation may represent "an account of how rhythm was performed, rather than a precise set of instructions for its realization", what musicologist Charles Seeger termed "descriptive" rather than "prescriptive" notation.
The traditional scholarly narrative positioned Ars Subtilior as a distinctly "southern" phenomenon, isolated from northern French traditions. This view rested on the observation that French song repertory from 1380-1420 survives predominantly in Italian manuscripts (Modena, Pavia, Florence) rather than French sources, while northern manuscripts (Low Countries) contain mostly simple Ars Nova-style works with very few Ars Subtilior pieces.
Yet this geographic narrative collapses under scrutiny. As Plumley demonstrates, "the mobility of musicians...and their patrons...should lead us to question the relevance of polarising style repertories on the grounds of geography." Musicians like Matheus de Sancto Johanne moved fluidly between Anjou's household, the papal chapel at Avignon, and possibly England. Patrons themselves, Louis d'Anjou crowned king of Naples in 1382, Jean de Berry governing territories from Paris to Auvergne, cannot be confined to single regions.
Most tellingly, the music itself reveals sophisticated intertextual relationships between supposedly "northern" post-Machaut works and "southern" Ars Subtilior compositions. The complex of wedding songs for Jean de Berry's 1389 marriage to Jeanne de Boulogne, including Trebor's "Passerose de beauté," Egidius's "Roses et lis," and Solage's "En l'amoureux vergier", demonstrates courtly musicians working in shared cultural contexts, sharing textual references, musical motifs, and rhetorical gestures regardless of geographic boundaries.
The question that has haunted Ars Subtilior scholarship since its modern rediscovery centers on performability: was this music actually sung, or did it exist primarily as intellectual artifact?
Willi Apel, in his foundational 1953 study, questioned whether actual performance was "ever possible or intended," viewing the extreme complexity as "mere tricks of affected erudition." He called Zacara's "Sumite karissimi" "the acme of rhythmic intricacy in the entire history of music," while Friedrich Ludwig dismissed it as a "Schulbeispiel ohne Bedeutung" (academic example without significance), and Nino Pirrotta considered it "servile imitation of French models" with "the character of an 'academic exercise.'"
Richard Crocker countered in 1966 that the complexity is "more apparent to the performer...than to the listener, who merely hears normal progressions through a delightful haze of ornamentation." Donald Greig, reflecting on decades of practical performance experience with the Orlando Consort, suggested pointedly that "Apel, I suggest, probably had not" heard the music in performance, unlike Crocker.
Greig's concept of the "performance palimpsest" provides crucial insight into how this music functions. The notation in manuscripts represents only one layer of meaning. Performers create what Greig terms a "rehearsal text" that combines:
Annotated notation (memorized or actual)
Memory of previous performances
Physical "muscle memory"
Interpretative cues and performance codes
This layered interpretation "lies virtually beyond analysis" but shapes actual sonic realization. Modern performers face three primary difficulties:
Rhythmic Comprehension: "A moment of quiet contemplation is usually needed" before singers can perform voice parts. "This is not music for sight-reading, though it would provide excellent music for a sight-reading test."
Realization vs. Prescription: The danger of sounding "too deliberate, too much like dictated freedom" when focusing on exact rhythmic execution, the risk of "accuracy at the expense of expression, exactness at the expense of fluency."
Ensemble Coordination: Each singer must balance complex individual rhythms against "often distracting counter-rhythms in the other voices."
Greig's crucial insight: "Scholarly studies...often assume that the written symbols always remain the primary source for the performer in performance. This is a myth." Performers apply "a series of performance codes to the notation in order to 'make sense' of the music to the listener", codes often drawn from the performer's own musical culture rather than historical context.
Daniel Leech-Wilkinson's analysis of articulation rests provides another window into performance practice. He identifies short minim rests in 14th-century French song manuscripts that cannot be explained by conventional functions, they're not phrase-ends, not breathing points (too short), not syncopation markers. Instead, they occur within continuing melodic phrases in works by Machaut ("Quant j'ay l'espart," "Pour ce que tous mes chans"), Anonymous composers ("Langue puens," "Dame sans per"), and others.
These articulation rests suggest "crisp articulation" similar to modern Baroque performance practice, creating emphasis through shortening notes on the beat and resulting in "strongly defined articulation" and "sequences of smaller units" within long melodic phrases. The evidence connects to hocket technique in motets and early 14th-century counterpoint treatises like Petrus dictus Palma ociosa (1336), showing written-in phrasing already linked to sequential melodic construction.
Crucially, articulation becomes integrated with syncopation, sequential melodic construction, and harmonic considerations, the boundary between "performance practice" and "composition" becomes meaningless. Some composers (Perusio, Senleches, Grimace) consistently notate articulation, while others (Matheus de Sancto Johanne) do not, possibly reflecting different approaches to notation detail rather than performance intention.
Stone's analysis pushes further: complex notation surviving in manuscripts may reflect "the kinds of habitual rhythmic gestures that were either performed or heard by whoever notated the music." Rather than composers inventing increasingly complicated rhythms to be performed, the notation may represent "an attempt to record rhythms whose first incarnation was in performance, not in writing."
This interpretation finds support in counterpoint treatises documenting "a practice of rhythmic performance that was independent both of the notated musical sources and also of the more scholarly tradition of musica mensurabilis treatises." The Quartum principale describes singers who should "break and flower the notes, as best befits the mensuration" without providing written examples. The Berkeley treatise acknowledges that "one may well syncopate in discanting and sing various mensurations that differ from that of the tenor."
The implication is profound: what appears in Ars Subtilior manuscripts may be "palimpsest of an original, possibly more simple set of instructions, overlaid through...elaboration and notational game-playing", attempts to capture in notation the complex rhythmic reality of contemporary virtuoso performance practice.
The defining characteristic of Ars Subtilior music is its treatment of rhythm and meter, what we might call "temporal monstrosity." Medieval music theory divided time through a system of mensuration based on perfect (triple) and imperfect (duple) divisions. The Ars Nova had already begun to complicate this system, but Ars Subtilior composers pushed mensural complexity into genuinely monstrous territory.
Ars Subtilior compositions frequently employ multiple simultaneous mensurations, creating proportional relationships between voices that can be staggeringly complex. A composition might have one voice moving in simple duple meter while another moves at 3:2, and a third at 9:4. The result is music where different temporal realities coexist simultaneously, where, in effect, time itself becomes unstable and multiple.
As TENET's concert notes observe, the new musical notation allowed "elaborate and flexible time-streams, with the music shifting meter sometimes every few moments." This development paralleled broader cultural shifts in temporal perception: Giovanni da Donda provided the first detailed description of clockwork mechanism in 1364, and for the first time, minute-hands began to appear on clocks. Musical time measurement was becoming "increasingly granular," reflecting broader technological and conceptual changes in how medieval culture understood temporal experience.
This temporal instability parallels the identity instability of medieval shapeshifting narratives. Just as the Green Knight exists simultaneously as courtly host and supernatural challenger, as Bertilak and as agent of Morgan le Fay, so Ars Subtilior music exists in multiple temporal states at once. The music doesn't resolve into a single stable rhythm; it maintains its multiplicities, insisting on the validity of contradictory temporal experiences occurring simultaneously.
Beyond proportional complexity, Ars Subtilior music employs syncopation with such extremity that the listener loses any stable sense of beat or meter. Accents fall in unexpected places, phrases begin off the beat, and cadential gestures are displaced by rests or unexpected rhythmic shifts. The music refuses to settle, refuses stability, refuses the listener's desire for predictable patterns.
Stone's reinterpretation of Zacara's "Sumite karissimi" reveals how what appears as "the acme of rhythmic intricacy in the entire history of music" may actually represent "a conceptually simple source", a performance gesture where a singer might "pause affectively before the word 'dearest'" which "would precipitate a lag behind the beat that the singer would have to make up before the next strong cadence point." Removing the syncopation reveals the underlying structural logic: "the second phrase is structurally the twin of the first phrase, transposed up a 5th." This "structure is what the performer/composer likely had in his mind when performing the piece, rather than the elaborate syncopated version that survives in Mod A."
The piece also contains a hidden acrostic, "RECONMENDATIONE Zaccaria", Zacara's self-promotional message embedded in the musical structure. The rhythmic alignment in bars 36-42 signals textual importance, and a singer aware of the acrostic can "reshape the phrase to underline the hidden word [RECON]-MEN-DA-TI-[O]."
This rhythmic restlessness embodies what Victor Turner identified as the liminal state, the threshold experience where normal structures are suspended and transformation becomes possible. The listener cannot maintain stable orientation; they must surrender to temporal ambiguity and find meaning in instability itself.
The notation required to capture this rhythmic complexity became increasingly elaborate, employing colored notes (red and sometimes black and white) to indicate different mensural meanings, complex ligatures combining multiple notes into single symbols, and flagging patterns that approach the limits of readable notation. Some compositions are so notionally complex that modern transcription into standard notation is approximate at best, the medieval notation itself becomes a kind of artefact that cannot be fully translated into later systems.
As Greig observes, modern transcription creates tension: it "strain[s] against the logic of equal bar-lengths, and...produce[s] seemingly ridiculous subdivisions of the beat." The visual layout of original manuscripts conveys information that conventional modern notation cannot capture.
This push toward notational extremity reveals something profound about the relationship between sound, symbol, and meaning. When notation becomes this complex, it's no longer simply a practical tool for performance but becomes an intellectual and visual artwork in its own right. The manuscript page becomes a space of contemplation, a visual manifestation of temporal complexity that exists alongside, and sometimes instead of, actual sonic realisation.
Greig's application of Roman Jakobson's communication theory proves illuminating here. Music from the Ars Subtilior period is fundamentally "about codes", it engages with "the issue of its exactness, of the extent to which the acoustic rendition accords with an actual score." The 14th-century exchange between audience and performer focused on "verification of the code." Visual and acoustic display function as "related concerns," with notation "beginning to become a part of performance, a moment of shared exchange between audience and performer."
Josephson identifies a significant body of "pervasively diatonic" compositions in Ars Subtilior manuscripts that "may be readily analyzed in terms of hexachordal mutations," firmly rooted in Machaut's late style. Key composers include:
Matheus de Sancto Johanne: "Je chante ung chant" (Ch, fol. 16); "Sans vous ne puis" (Ch, fol. 35)
Guido: "Or voit tout" (Ch, fol. 25v)
Jean Vaillant: Five Chantilly compositions preferring "C- and G-hexachordal outlines and frequent triadic pitch relationships around C-E-G." Mentioned with Machaut in the Règles de la seconde rhétorique (1411) as "master who runs a music school in Paris," Vaillant's ballade "Par maintes foys" was "hugely popular, surviving in nine different sources."
Jehan Symonis dit Hasprois: His "Ma doulce amour" (Ch, fol. 34) demonstrates "strongly diatonic foundation grounded within the F- and C-hexachords" with "an elaborate theme and variations, somewhat in the manner of Machaut's late ballade no. 39, Mes esperis." The compositional techniques trace directly back to "Machaut's late ballades nos. 28 (Je puis), 34 (Quant Theseus/Ne), and 37 (Dame, se vous)" with their sequential thirds and tertial connections.
Significantly, "Ma doulce amour" survives not only in Chantilly but also in the 15th-century manuscript Oxford can. 213, demonstrating this diatonic tradition's survival into the next generation. Anonymous works like the ballade "Se demon mal" (Torino J.II.9) and later Burgundian chansons such as Dufay's rondeau "Adieu m'amour" continue these techniques, establishing clear historical continuity from Machaut through Ars Subtilior to the early Renaissance.
Josephson traces chromatic practices to Machaut's works (ballades nos. 19, 20, 25, 30; Messe de Notre Dame), but Ars Subtilior composers developed these techniques to unprecedented extremes:
Advanced Chromatic Techniques: "Descending contrapuntal lines typically initiate on the profiled g' of the discantus and cascade down by whole-steps to f#'-e'-d'" with "prominent F#-C tritone relationships" suggesting "a kind of C-Lydian modal admixture to the basic C-Dorian modality."
Goscalch's "En nule stat" (Ch, fol. 39v): D-Dorian mode extended to secondary cadences on E and F#
Zacharias's "Sumite, karissimi": Similar procedures with "tertial F♮ degree even stronger throughout"
Anonymous "Medee fu" (Ch, fol. 24v): Features "nearly identical chromatic motives (namely A♭-G-F-G♭-F#-F-E-D in mm. 8-17/17a)." TENET's program notes describe this piece as having "three musical lines work almost like Elliot Carter's music, with independent time-streams that only periodically intersect" where "mathematics of music become, in performance, a strangely flexible and almost jazz-like transformation of time."
These chromatic techniques often serve expressive text-painting:
Anonymous "En la saison" (Ch, fol. 46): Chromatic passages set "une grant merveille" (a great marvel) describing a miraculous apparition
Anonymous "De tous les moys" (Ch, fol. 48): Spring themes lead to "prominent tritone (final C-f# in mm. 18-19) relationships" contrasting with winter sadness
Block Chord Technique: Chromatic leading-tones coupled with static, sustained block chords temporarily delay final pitch resolution, a technique inherited from Machaut and employed in F. Andrieu's funeral ballade "Armes/O flour des flours" (Ch, fol. 52).
Josephson identifies how "later parts of the Chantilly and Modena repertories appear to blend and reconcile stylistic features of categories A and B":
Anonymous "En un vergier" (Modena, fol. 18v, c. 1400-1410): Combines "prevailing G-Dorian mode reminiscent of Philipoctus de Caserta's music" with "monothematic (and theme and variation) techniques of Hasprois and Cuvelier" plus "preservation of material from both sections a and b in the refrain, coupled with elaborate transformation and metamorphosis devices" marking it as "a late and especially refined end stage of the Ars Subtilior."
Suzoy's "Pictagoras, Jabol et Orpheus": Features tertial relationships around Bb-d-g that "Already Machaut had used...in his ballades nos. 19, 25, and 36" combined with "especially elaborate final proportio dupla episode in the discantus, measures 26-30 and (embellished) 68-72 that must rank among the most successful penned during the late Ars Subtilior."
Rodericus's "Angelorum psalat": Demonstrates "most progressive type of pitch architecture, in which the secondary pitch hierarchy, F-Ab-C increasingly resolves to the more stable tertial matrix on Eb-G-Bb" with motivic integration where all three sections begin with elaborate discantus displacements "in the manner of Senleches's En attendant."
One of the most striking features of Ars Subtilior manuscripts is the presence of mass movements, sacred texts set to music, that employ the same experimental techniques as secular love songs. The Chantilly Codex contains 78 mass movements from the Avignon region, with settings of the Gloria and Credo that are rhythmically and harmonically indistinguishable from contemporary courtly chansons.
This stylistic continuity between sacred and secular represents a radical departure from earlier medieval practice, which typically maintained clear distinctions between liturgical and secular musical styles. The theological implications are profound: if the same musical language serves both divine worship and earthly love, what does this suggest about the relationship between sacred and profane experience?
The Ars Subtilior response seems to be that these categories are themselves unstable, that music as cosmic principle transcends the distinctions human theology attempts to impose upon it. Music serves love, both divine and human, and the same intricate temporal beauty can manifest devotion to God or devotion to a lady. The boundary dissolves not through rejection of either category but through insistence that both participate in the same fundamental harmonic order.
Matteo da Perugia's "Pres du soloil," as TENET's notes observe, "looks towards the next generation of composers, with a clearer texture and wonderfully spacious harmonic motion." As magister capellae at Milan Cathedral in the first decade of the 15th century, Matteo's duties included participating "in the celebration of Mass and Vespers together with the ordained members of the church, honouring the choir with sweet melodies." His position gave him direct access to manuscript compilation, potentially explaining the elaborate ornamentation preserved in some versions of sacred works, these may represent "the 'sweet melodies' that the cathedral deputies envisioned...presumably improvised" polyphonic elaborations of chant.
The isorhythmic motet tradition, inherited from the Ars Nova, reaches its apex of complexity in Ars Subtilior compositions. These works employ repeating rhythmic patterns (talea) overlaid on repeating pitch patterns (color) in the tenor voice, while upper voices weave increasingly elaborate melodies above this foundation.
Virginia Newes's comprehensive study of imitation identifies several types of imitative techniques in Ars nova and Ars subtilior repertoire:
Voice Exchange (Stimmtausch): Common in earlier Notre-Dame organa, this technique evolved in the Ars nova into passing of short motifs between voices without overlapping
Melodic Fragment Exchange: Machaut developed "exchange of continually varied melodic fragments...seldom resulting in true imitations" with "minute attention to detail...compared to miniature painting"
Rhythmic Imitation: "Appears far more frequently than melodic imitation and constitutes an important factor of cohesion between the voices," often found in melismatic cadences of ballades and rondeaux
Alternating Declamation: "Alternate declamation in syllabic style of single words or phrases, creating an effect of imitation which emphasizes certain elements of the text"
Extended imitation in non-canonic works appears "relatively rare, and appears to have been reserved for ceremonial works." Philippe de Vitry's "Petre Clemens - Lugentium siccentur" (1342-1352) presents the "entire first line of the triplum...motetus enters four measures later...in strict imitation." Similar techniques appear in "Rex Karole, Johannis genite" (1375, celebrating Charles V's peace treaty with England) and "Pictagore per dogmata" (early 1375, for Pope Gregory XI's planned crusade).
But Ars Subtilior composers subvert even highly structured forms. They employ isorhythm with such long patterns and complex proportional relationships that the repetitions become virtually imperceptible to listeners. The structure exists, the mathematical beauty is present, but it operates at scales beyond human perceptual capacity. This creates music that is simultaneously rigorously ordered and experientially chaotic, music where cosmic order and apparent disorder coexist.
This parallels medieval theological debates about divine providence: God's plan orders all things perfectly, yet from human perspective, the world appears chaotic and morally ambiguous. The isorhythmic motet becomes a sonic manifestation of this theological paradox, music that embodies perfect order while sounding freely improvisatory.
The Ars Subtilior flourished during the Great Schism (1378-1417), when competing popes in Rome and Avignon each claimed supreme authority over Christendom. The Chantilly manuscript itself contains 112 polyphonic works "created for the Southern French courts connected to the Babylonian captivity, the period when the Papal court had moved to Avignon."
This crisis of authority created cultural conditions where experimentation and boundary-transgression became not merely possible but necessary. When even the papacy's unity fractures, when the highest earthly authority becomes contested and multiple, what other certainties can remain stable?
Papal Avignon functioned as crucial musical crossroads. Three Ars subtilior composers are definitively connected to the papal chapel:
Matheus de Sancto Johanne (singer 1382-1386)
Jean Haucourt (Johannes Altacuria) (1393-1403/4)
Jean Symonis dit Hasprois (1393-1403/4)
Together they represent twelve songs in the Chantilly codex; with other papal references, eighteen songs or "nearly a fifth of the total." As Plumley observes, "Here congregated the best sacred and secular musicians of the day, and it is here that secular princes, as well as prelates, came to recruit their musical personnel," facilitating musical exchange between northern and southern courts.
The cultural work of Ars Subtilior music, with its multiplication of temporal realities and dissolution of categorical boundaries, reflects and responds to this broader crisis of authority and meaning. The music performs, at the aesthetic level, the same kind of radical instability that characterised the political and religious landscape.
The Ars Subtilior emerged in the decades following the Black Death (1347-1352), which killed between one-third and one-half of Europe's population, an estimated 20-30 million Europeans. As Anna DesOrmeaux documents, this catastrophic mortality transformed medieval consciousness, disrupting social hierarchies, challenging theological certainties, and creating acute awareness of life's fragility and arbitrariness.
The plague continued in subsequent outbreaks recorded in 1362, 1368, 1374, 1381, 1390, 1399, 1405, 1410, 1423, and 1429, with lower mortality (10-20% average) but significant psychological impact. Contemporary accounts reveal profound trauma:
Petrarch (1349): "empty houses, derelict cities, ruined estates, fields strewn with cadavers, [and] a horrible and vast solitude encompassing the whole world"
Boccaccio: "This tribulation had stricken such terror...that brother forsook brother, uncle nephew and sister brother"
Matteo Villani: Survivors "forgot the past as though it had never been"
The psychological impact manifested in what DesOrmeaux terms "protective apathy", emotional detachment as coping mechanism. "Bereavement was the signal for laughter and witticisms and general jollification" (Boccaccio). As Viktor Frankl would later observe of concentration camp survivors, "an abnormal reaction to an abnormal situation is normal behavior."
The artistic response was delayed: "There is not much plague imagery in years immediately after the Black Death, but imagery began to appear more in the third quarter of the fourteenth century and later." During and immediately after the Black Death, "art was rarely produced, and 'most of the trades disappeared.'" Yet when artistic production resumed, "plague art conveys hope more frequently than it conveys despair. There was no desire to relive these horrors through viewing nightmarish images."
The extreme complexity and instability of Ars Subtilior music can be read as an aesthetic response to this transformed consciousness. In a world where death arrives suddenly and inexplicably, where social order has been violently disrupted, where survivors live among ruins, what forms of order, stability, and beauty remain possible?
The Ars Subtilior answer seems to be: not the old forms, not the stable hierarchies and certainties of the pre-plague world, but new forms that acknowledge instability, embrace complexity, find beauty in the liminal and uncertain. Music that doesn't deny the chaos but transforms it into art.
Pope Benedict XII's bull Benedictus Deus (1336) established that souls are "immediately judged once, and then again in an ultimate judgment at the end of time." This doctrinal change had profound implications: the "new-found insignificance of the physical body led to an interest in the body's decay and the appearance in art of the transi, or a decaying corpse." The concept of Purgatory became more significant as prayers and good deeds of the living could cleanse deceased souls, leading to increased bequests to Church.
This theological shift affected how medieval culture understood the relationship between body and soul, physical and spiritual, temporal and eternal. If the body's significance diminished, did musical embodiment, the physical act of singing, the bodily production of sound, also lose theological weight? Or did music, as mathematical principle underlying cosmic order, transcend bodily limitations entirely?
The Ars Subtilior's complex notation, potentially unperformable by unaided human voices, may reflect this theological shift. If music represents cosmic order rather than merely human cultural achievement, perhaps it need not be bounded by human performative capacity. The music exists in the mind of God, in the mathematical relationships inscribed on manuscript pages, regardless of whether any physical being ever produces the corresponding sounds.
Ars Subtilior music flourished particularly in aristocratic courts where wealth and patronage enabled extended artistic experimentation. Jean de Berry's court provides the most thoroughly documented example:
Chapel Establishment: "Six chaplains, one clerk and two choirboys by 1372" growing to "ten chaplains, six clerks, a chasublier, six sommeliers and a varlet de chapelle" serving a court of 250 members by the 1390s
Chronicler's testimony: Berry "maintain[ed] a great number of chaplains to sing God's praises and the Mass day and night"
Jean de Berry's Musical Patronage Chapel Establishment and Growth
Chapel personnel by 1372: six chaplains, one clerk and two choirboys By the 1390s: ten chaplains, six clerks, a chasublier, six sommeliers and a varlet de chapelle serving a court of 250 members
A contemporary chronicler testified that Berry "maintain[ed] a great number of chaplains to sing God's praises and the Mass day and night." In an age when musical sophistication signalled political legitimacy and cultural authority, Berry's chapel represented substantial investment in sonic power.
The economic commitment was staggering. Maintaining such an establishment required not merely initial recruitment but ongoing payment, housing, clothing, and the infrastructure of musical production, manuscript copying, instrument acquisition, rehearsal spaces. Berry's household accounts reveal systematic expenditure on musical materials and personnel that rivals contemporary military budgets. This was cultural warfare waged through sound.
Connected Composers and Commissioned Works
Solage stands as the most represented composer in the Chantilly codex, with his ballade "S'aincy estoit" explicitly praising "bon Jhean, duc gentilz de Berry" as "la flour du monde" (the flower of the world). The identification isn't certain, but villages called Soulages exist in Auvergne, Berry's territories, suggesting possible geographic connections. His ballades "Calextone" and "Corps femenin" feature acrostics spelling "Cathelline," possibly for Catherine of France, further linking him to royal circles.
Jean Vaillant represents another crucial connection. A clerc in Berry's service appears in household accounts from 1377 and 1387, possibly identifiable with the composer. The poetry treatise Les règles de la seconde rhétorique (1411) mentions Vaillant alongside Machaut as "master who runs a music school in Paris," suggesting he moved between Berry's court and Parisian musical establishments. His rondeau "Dame doucement" bears the inscription "compilatum fuit parisius anno domini MCCC sexagesimo nono" (composed in Paris in 1369), documenting this mobility.
The 1389 marriage of Jean de Berry to Jeanne de Boulogne generated a complex of wedding songs that demonstrate sophisticated musical networking. Trebor's "Passerose de beauté" and Egidius's "Roses et lis" share the textual line "En Engaddy la precieuse vigne" and musical material, allegorically describing the marriage using flower imagery. Solage's "En l'amoureux vergier" develops the rose/garden theme, sharing rhymes and vocabulary with the wedding songs. These works demonstrate courtly musicians working in shared cultural contexts, sharing textual references, musical motifs, and rhetorical gestures regardless of geographic boundaries.
The diplomatic dimension is crucial. The marriage required complex negotiations with Gaston Fébus of Foix to secure French interests in Languedoc. Trebor's "Se July Cesar" and Cuvelier's "Se Galaas" functioned as paired songs praising Fébus, written as part of diplomatic strategy to secure his cooperation. Trebor's "Quant joyne cuer," previously misidentified as celebrating an Aragonese king, actually celebrates Berry's acquisition of Auvergne county through the marriage.
The Economics of Musical Innovation
The survival of Ars Subtilior music in manuscripts tells an economic story. Manuscript production was expensive — parchment, specialised scribes capable of complex notation, illumination, binding. The Chantilly codex represents substantial capital investment. That such a manuscript was commissioned and preserved demonstrates aristocratic conviction that this music mattered, that its complexity and sophistication justified extraordinary expense.
Berry's accounts reveal payments for manuscript copying, for recruiting singers from distant establishments, for purchasing instruments. A single entry from 1374 records payment to Jaquet de Noyon, 60 gold francs "to buy a harp and to travel to the minstrel schools." This represents roughly a year's income for a skilled craftsman, deployed to acquire a single instrument and enable a musician's education. The scale of investment enabled the experimental freedom that characterizes Ars Subtilior composition.
Patronage created protected spaces where composers could push boundaries without immediate market pressures. Unlike later periods where composers needed to please ticket-buying publics, Ars Subtilior composers answered primarily to aristocratic patrons whose cultural authority depended partly on supporting the most advanced, sophisticated, and challenging music available. Difficulty became a virtue, music that required trained, educated listeners signalled the patron's own sophistication and cultural discernment.
This dynamic explains the music's extremity. When your patron's prestige depends partly on supporting the most intellectually advanced art, there's positive incentive to create music that challenges even expert listeners. The complexity wasn't despite patronage but because of patronage structures that rewarded innovation and difficulty.
The Ars Subtilior represents the sonic equivalent of what the Green Knight embodies in narrative, a radical challenge to stability, categorical certainty, and comfortable assumptions. Just as the Green Knight forces Gawain to confront the instability of identity and the persistent power of what civilisation defines itself against, so Ars Subtilior music forces listeners into temporal liminality where normal orientations dissolve.
Temporal Monstrosity as Cultural Work
When different voices move in multiple simultaneous meters, when syncopation becomes so extreme that downbeats disappear, when proportional relationships create temporal realities that can barely coexist. This isn't technical showing-off. It's profound cultural work responding to a world where certainties had catastrophically collapsed.
The Black Death killed between a third and half of Europe's population. The Great Schism split the papacy, creating competing claims to ultimate religious authority. The Hundred Years' War devastated France. This wasn't a world where stable categories and comfortable certainties made sense. This was a world of radical instability, where death arrived without warning, where the highest authorities were contested, where everything solid could dissolve overnight.
Ars Subtilior music embodies this instability rather than denying it. It creates sonic experiences where listeners cannot maintain stable temporal orientation, where multiple contradictory realities coexist simultaneously, where the relationship between notation and sound becomes ambiguous and contested.
Performance as Transformation
The complex relationship between Ars Subtilior notation and actual performance parallels medieval shapeshifting narratives. Just as the Green Knight exists simultaneously as Bertilak and as Morgan's agent, as courtly host and supernatural challenger, so Ars Subtilior music exists in multiple states, as notated artefact, as performance palimpsest, as improvised elaboration, as intellectual game, as sonic event.
The notation doesn't fully determine the sound. Performers must negotiate between what's written and what's singable, between mathematical precision and musical expression, between individual complexity and ensemble coordination. Each performance constitutes a transformation — the fixed notation becomes fluid sound, the visual becomes aural, the abstract becomes embodied. The music shape-shifts in the act of performance.
This performative transformation reveals something profound about medieval epistemology. The modern assumption that a single "correct" performance can be extracted from notation reflects post-Enlightenment desires for singular, stable truth. Medieval culture was more comfortable with multiplicity. The same text could yield multiple valid readings, the same person could embody different identities, the same musical notation could generate different sonic realisations. Truth wasn't singular but perspectival, contextual, performative.
Monster-Musicians and Temporal Monsters
The connection between visual monster-musicians in manuscript margins and the temporal monstrosity of Ars Subtilior music becomes clear. Both inhabit liminal spaces — marginalia occupy the edges of the page where text meets non-text, where sacred manuscript meets profane decoration; Ars Subtilior music occupies the edges of performability where notation meets sound, where human capacity meets mathematical complexity.
Both challenge categorical boundaries. Monster-musicians dissolve distinctions between rational soul and animal nature, between subject and object, between performer and instrument. Ars Subtilior music dissolves distinctions between composition and improvisation, between written and unwritten tradition, between intellectual exercise and performance practice.
Both serve as "technologies of containment" that paradoxically acknowledge what they contain. By placing monsters in margins, medieval manuscripts acknowledged their persistent presence whilst maintaining their separation from textual authority. By notating extreme complexity, Ars Subtilior composers acknowledged performance practices that exceeded conventional notation whilst attempting to capture them in written form. In both cases, the very effort to contain reveals the power and importance of what's being contained.